Debate in SC

Well here is my first thought on the South Carolina debate: It was embarrassing and terrible, to both the candidates and the republican party. I was utterly disappointed in the moderators and some of the candidates during this exchange. Some of the candidates who are holding on by a few votes, really showed their true colors. This is the debate right before the South Carolina polls, and instead of speaking rationally it came to unreasonably criticizing other candidates. Here is what I got from each person:

Donald Trump:

I think this guy lead the chaos and his performance was down, and I think he tried to get his opponents angry and irrational by tearing down their family and/or beliefs. He started criticizing the candidates character (and family). Donald Trump's speeches would make a great reality show, but his answers and character makes me fear the possibility of his presidency. 

Side Note:

I would hope that the candidates would have the amount of character to be able to win on their own merit. I don't like the idea of slamming everyone else until you are the last one standing. Even if it is a debate, I think it should be conducted in an honorable and courteous way.

Ted Cruz:
I believe this man acted the most reasonably, yet he was considered to have not fared as well. I think he was one of the only ones who did not engage in the name calling, family smashing, pride building, Sarah Palin talk. He did get into a few arguments with Marco Rubio, but I think that he did well in debating the matter without resorting to name calling or such. In my opinion he held his own, and this debate causes me to respect him all the more. If you happen to have a different opinion, just put a comment down below. I would be happy to see your opinion.

Marco Rubio:
Some of you know that I had said that Cruz would be slightly better than Rubio, but that I wouldn't mind him winning. I here want to say that the past two debates have changed my opinion dramatically. The debate in NH aroused a very concerning issue to me. It was on the issue of drafting teenage (and older) girls into the military, in the event of war. I fundamentally believe this is wrong mostly because I believe God has created men to protect women. I believe God has (generally) gifted men with more strength than women, and that mean they should be the protectors and providers of women. In the NH debate Marco Rubio said that he supports forcing teenage and older women into the military. Also in this previous debate, he showed how desperate he was by resorting to Donald Trump tactics. I think that some voters looking for an alternative to Trump are going to him, so that in my mind brings him down.

Jeb Bush:
If I had to say the one person who was most attacked in the last debate it was Governor Jeb Bush. That being said the way he responded tot he attacks just allowed more opportunity for Trump to attack. I do not think that it was President George W. Bush's fault on 9/11. I think it was cheap and dirty for Donald Trump to try to get to Jeb through that. Although, as I said before I was not impressed with his defense.

Side Note:
Jeb Bush forgot to renew his web domain, so Trump jumped on it. Check it out: JebBush.com.

Ben Carson:
Ben Carson didn't engage in the cheap debating, but I think the reason was because he fell asleep in the middle of the debate. He did not give any information that he had not already given, so I would say he did...decently.

John Kasich:
Well based on the SC debate and his NH "victory" speech, I am firmly convinced that he wants to be America's teddy bear. He engaged in the yelling, and then immediately afterwords told the crowd that he was too optimistic to engage in what he was just doing. So I'd give him a thumbs down.

Moderators:
Completely bowled over.

If you have anything additional to add to this let me know. I'd love to hear you opinion.
To God be the glory!